A COMING AGE OF MICRO GAME OF POWER: HISTORY AND REALITY

  • Zhang Jiadong Fudan University

Abstract

The traditional theory of international relations, whether it is realism, liberalism, constructivism, or scientific behaviorism, define sovereign states as a unified body in international arena. It has consistent interests, and naturally also has consistent foreign policy goals and means. In the 20th century, and especially during the two World Wars and the Cold War, this conceptual abstraction was very accurate. But after the end of the Cold War, especially in the 21st century, this concept gradually went against the reality of international relations. On the one hand, the comprehensive strength of a country cannot directly transform competitive advantages in specific areas; on the other hand, the main resistance of many countries, including superpowers, may not be another power, but different domestic interest groups as well as international non state actors. This has caused traditional international relations theories, from hypotheses to conceptual and inferential levels, to be unable to explain the world today.

Author Biography

Zhang Jiadong, Fudan University

Professor in international relations, director of Center for South Asian Studies, senior researcher in Center for American Studies, Fudan University

References

詹姆斯多尔蒂、小罗伯特普法尔茨格拉夫,《争论中的国际关系理论》第五版,阎学通陈寒溪译,世界知识出版社,2003年,第6页。 [Doherty, J., Pfaltzgraf, R.Jr. (2003). The Theory of International Relations in Dispute. Fifth Edition, translated by Yan Xuetong and Chen Hanxi, World Knowledge Press]

高奇琦,“现实主义与建构主义的合流及其发展思路”,《世界经济与政治》,2014年第3期,第92-93页。 [Gao Qiqi. (2014). The Confluence of Realism and Constructivism and Its Development Ideas. World Economy and Politics. 3.]

苏长和,“自由主义与世界政治-----自由主义国际关系理论的启示”,《世界经济与政治》2004年第7期,第16页。[Su Changhe. (2004). Liberalism and World Politics-The Inspiration of Liberal International Relations Theory. World Economy and Politics. 7.]

秦亚青,“行动的逻辑:西方国际关系理论‘知识转向’的意义”,《中国社会科学》,2013年第12期,第183页。[Qin Yaqing. (2013). Logic of Action: The Significance of “Knowledge Turning” in Western International Relations Theory. Chinese Social Sciences. 12.]

程恩富:《现代马克思主义政治经济学的四大理论假设》,《中国社会科学》,2007年第1期。 [Cheng Enfu. (2007). Four Theoretical Hypotheses of Modern Marxist Political Economics. Chinese Social Sciences. 1.]

大卫科兹,“苏联解体的原因”,《当代思潮》,2000年第5期,第33页。 [Kotz, D. (2000). The Reasons for the Disintegration of the Soviet Union. Contemporary Thoughts. 5.]

唐永胜、刘东哲、陈晓东,“冷战后全球武装冲突的特点及演变”,《现代国际关系》,2008年第8期,第3页。[Tang Yongsheng, Liu Dongzhe, Chen Xiaodong. (2008). Characteristics and Evolution of Global Armed Conflicts After the Cold War. Modern International Relations. 8.]

Published
2020-07-31