BALANCING SECURITY AND REGULATION: THE EU’S CONUNDRUM IN MILITARY AI GOVERNANCE
Abstract
Research Paper
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37458/ssj.5.3.1
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become an integral component within a wide array of weapon systems and critical infrastructure, serving as a fundamental framework for seamless integration with diverse technologies. However, the convergence of technology, military apparatus, and operational efficiency has facilitated the gradual securitization of technology regulation. This trend underscores the increasing portrayal of technology development as a matter of security relevance over recent decades. Facing a complex geopolitical landscape, the European Union's discussions on “strategic autonomy” and “technology sovereignty” encompass considerations of innovative advancements in defense technologies, particularly emphasizing the exploration of AI’s potential for enhancing military security capacities. Meanwhile, regulation stands as a pivotal instrument within technology security policies, given AI's dual-use nature and its implications for geopolitical competition, the EU’s ongoing efforts to establish comprehensive AI regulations are crucial. The regulation of more clandestine military AI applications remains a significant area of exploration for the EU. Consequently, the core research inquiry revolves around the EU’s strategic alignment between security imperatives and regulatory frameworks concerning the military application of AI, aiming to ascertain its capability to strike a balance between fostering developmental capacities and implementing effective risk regulation.
References
．Krepinevich, A. (1994). Cavalry to Computer: The Pattern of Military Revolutions. The National Interest, (37). 30.
．Thornton, R. & Miron, M. (2020). Towards the “Third Revolution in Military Affairs”: The Russian Military’s Use of AI-Enabled Cyber Warfare. The RUSI Journal,165(3).18.
．Horowitz, M. (2010). The Diffusion of Military Power: Causes and Consequences for International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 3.
．Besenyő, J. & Málnássy, A. (2024). Geopolitical Dimension of Libyan Drone Warfare: The Use of Turkish Drones on the North African Battlefields, Obrana a strategie, 24 (1). 3-17.
．Yue, SS. (2021). Revisiting Securitization: Theoretical Dilemmas and New Explorations in Foreign Policy Discourse Analysis. Journal of International Relations, (3). 8.
．Downey, A. (2024). Algorithmic predictions and pre-emptive violence: artificial intelligence and the future of unmanned aerial systems. Digital War, (5), 123-133.
．Ross, D. (2018). Terrorists Are Going to Use Artificial Intelligence.Defense one. Defense One, Available at: https://www.defenseone.com /ideas/2018/05/terrorists-are-going-to-use-artificial-intelligence/147944/.
．Hurst, P. & Hompson, G. (2002). Questioning Globalization: Possibilities for International Economics and Governance. Beijing: Social Science Literature Publishing House. 1.
．Ilijevski, I. et al. (2023). The Weaponisation of Drones – A Threat from Above Used for Terrorist Purposes. Journal of Criminal Justice and Security, (3). 336-349.
． Besenyő, J. & Márton, K. (2021). Hospital Attacks Since 9/11: An Analysis of Terrorism Targeting Healthcare Facilities and Workers. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 47(1). 36–59.
． Ihde, D. (2009). Postphenomenology and technoscience: The Peking University Lectures. New York:State University of New York Press. 23.
．Piper, I. & Dyke, J. (2021). Tens of thousands of civilians likely killed by US in “Forever Wars”. Airwars. Available at: https://airwars.org/news-and-investigations/tens-of-thousands-of-civilians-likely-killed-by- us-in-forever-wars/.
．Kinnvall, C. et al. (2018). Introduction to 2018 Special Issue of European Security: Ontological (In)Security in the European Union. European Security, 27(3). 249-265.
．Council of the European Union. (2022). A Strategic Compass for Security and Defence - For a European Union that protects its citizens, values and interests and contributes to international peace and security. Available at: https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST- 7371-2022-INIT/en/pdf.
．Csernatoni, R. (2018). Constructing the EU's High-Tech Borders: FRONTEX and Dual-Use Drones for Border Management. European Security, 27(2). 180.
．European Defence Agency. (2019). Presentation by Jean-François Ripoche at SEDE public hearing on Artificial Intelligence-enabled systems in security and defense. Available at: https://www. europarl.europa.eu/cmsdata/194142/SEDE_hearing_presentation_Ripoche_3December2019-original.pdf.
．Franco–British St. Malo Declaration. Available at: https://www.cvce.eu/en/obj/franco_british_st_malo_declaration_4_ december_1998-en-f3cd16fb-fc37-4d52-936f-c8e9bc80f24f.html
．European Council. (2022). Informal meeting of the Heads of State or Government Versailles Declaration. Available at:https://www.consilium .europa.eu/media/54773/20220311-versailles-declaration-en.pdf
．Hecht, G. (1998). The radiance of France. nuclear power and national identify after World War 2. Cambridge:MIT Press.12.
．European Commission. (2021a). Action plan on synergies between Civil, Defence, and Space Industries. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/info/files/action-plan-synergies-between-civil-defence-and-space-industries_en.
．European Commission. (2021b) “2021 State of the Union Address by President von der Leyen. Available at: https://ec.europa. eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/SPEECH_21_4701
．N. Karampekios, et al. (eds.). (2018). The Emergence of EU Defence Research Policy. from Innovation to Militarization. Cham:Springer International Publishing.
．European Union Global Strategy. (2016). A Global Strategy for the European Union's Foreign and Security Policy: Shared Vision, Common Action: A Stronger Europe. Available at: https://eeas.europa.eu/archives/docs/top_stories/pdf/eugs_review_web.pdf
．Council of the European Union (2017a), “Council Decision Establishing Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) and Determining the List of Participating Member States. Available at:http://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/32000/st14866en17.pdf.
．Council of the European Union (2017b). European Defence: Council Agrees Its Position on the Proposed Regulation Establishing the European Defence Industrial Development Programme (EDIDP). Development Programme (EDIDP). Available at:http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2017/12/12/european -defence-council-agrees-its-position-on-the-proposed-regulation-establishing-the-european-defence-industrial-development-programme -edidp/pdf
．EDF. (2024). Discover the EDF. Available at: https://defence-industry-space.ec.europa.eu/eu-defence-industry/european-defence-fund-edf_en
．European Commission. (2021a). Action plan on synergies between Civil, Defence, and Space Industries. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/info/files/action-plan-synergies-between-civil-defence-and-space-industries_en.
．Ibid.
．European Commission. (2022). Defence industry: EU takes steps to invest almost €1.2 bn. Available at:https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_22_4595.
．Airbus. (2020). Future combat air systems: owning the sky with the next generation weapons system. Available at: https://www.airbus.com/en/newsroom/stories/2020-06-future-combat-air-system-owning-the-sky-with-the-next-generation-weapons
．Andrasko, J. et al. (2021). The regulatory intersections between artificial intelligence, data protection and cyber security: Challenges and opportunities for the EU Legal Framework. AI and Society, (36). 623-636.
．Majone, G. (1994). The rise of the regulatory state in Europe. West European Politics, 17(3). 77-101.
．Wæver, O. (1995). Securitization and desecuritization. In R. Lipschutz (eds.). On security. Columbia: Columbia University Press. 46-86.
．Hobbs, C. (2020). Europe's digital sovereignty: From rulemaker to superpower in the age of US-China rivalry. ECFR. Available at:https://ecfr.eu/publication/europe_digital_sovereignty_rulemaker_superpower_age_us_china_rivalry/
．Biedenkopf, K. et al. (2021). Introduction: shades of contestation and politicization of CFSP. European security, 30(3). 332.
．European Parliament. (2021a). Guidelines for military and non-military use of Artificial Intelligence. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20210114IPR95627/guidelines-for-military-and-non-military-use-of-artificial-intelligence
．European Parliament. (2021b). European Parliament resolution of 20 January 2021 on artificial intelligence. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/ doceo/document/TA-9-2021-0009_EN.html.
．European Commission. (2019a). Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI. Available at: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai
．European Union External Action. (2018a). Global tech panel: Mogherini starts debate with tech leaders. Available at: https://www.eeas.europa.eu/node/45483_en
．European Parliament. (2018). European Parliament resolution of 12 September 2018 on autonomous weapon systems (2018/2752(RSP) ). Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0341_EN.html#:~:text=European%20Parliament%20resolution%% of 20of%2012%20September%202018%20on,1%20of%201977%20additional%20to%20the%20Geneva%20Conventions%2C
． Brzozowski A. (2019). European Defense Fund agreed amid ethics concerns. Available at: https://www.euractiv.com/section/defence-and-security/news/european-defence-fund-agreed-amid-ethics-concerns/
．European Parliament. (2021c). “Report on artificial intelligence: Questions of interpretation and application of international law in so far as the EU is affected in the areas of civil and military uses and of state authority outside the scope of criminal justice, 2021/C 456/04. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2021-0001_EN.html.
．Denk, S. & Kayser, D. (2017). Keeping control of European positions on lethal autonomous weapon systems. Available at: https://www.paxforpeace.nl/ publications/all-publications/keeping-control.
．European Parliament (2020),“Framework of ethical aspects of artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies, P9_TA(2020)0275. October 20, 2020, Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2020-0275_EN.html.
．European Parliament. (2021b). European Parliament resolution of 20 January 2021 on artificial intelligence. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/ doceo/document/TA-9-2021-0009_EN.html.
．Barbé, E. & Badell, D.(2020). The European Union and lethal autonomous weapons systems: United in diversity? In EJ.Nogués et al. (eds.). European Union Contested. Norm Research in International Relations. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 133-152.
．European Union External Action. (2018b). Group of governmental experts convention on certain conventional weapons: EU statement: Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems (LAWS). Available at: https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/headquarters-homepage/43045/group-governmental-experts-convention- certain-conventional-weapons-eu-statement-lethal_en
．Fiott, D. & Lindstrom, G. (2018). Artificial Intelligence, what implications for EU security and defense? European Union Institute for Security Studies Brief. Available at:https://www.iss.europa.eu/content/artificial-intelligence-–-what-implications-eu-security-and-defence.
．European Commission. (2019b). Policy and investment recommendations for trustworthy AI. Available at:https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/policy-and-investment-recommendations-trustworthy-artificial-intelligence
© 2020 Security Science Journal. All rights reserved
